What AI-Assisted Coding Actually Means for Your Career — and Why the News Is Better Than You Think
🎧 Audio Edition: Prefer to listen? Check out...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Thanks for this post. I think lots of dev dilemma is raised here.
Here it is assumed that, the AI writes code in lang X which Timothy is skilled in.
I wonder how this below scenario would be handled:
Dev is skilled in language X but not in Y and she/he needs to produce in lang Y for some reasons.
The AI will generate it of course and dev will probably understand the data flow, data models and architecture well enough, but being not so skilled in syntax may cause her/him to skip possible optimization points or worse, possible error-prone areas.
Alptekin, you make a great point here. 💯
Margaret's answer, I think, would be this: Claude Code doesn't replace the need to understand the language you're shipping in. It lowers the barrier to entry, but it doesn't eliminate the responsibility. If you're producing production code in a language you don't know deeply, your review process needs to be proportionally more rigorous — and honest about its own limits.
The honest developer says 'I built this in Go with AI assistance and I'd want a Go practitioner to review it before it ships.' That's not weakness. That's good judgment, imho. ❤✨
Thank you and additionally imho, this could also be a good chance for the dev to build skills in this specific language too. It is like a mentor who never gets tired (but occasionally may fail to give the most correct answer - so one must be cautious)
Please am still a beginner please I just want to be a programmer 🤦🤦
Hi dulfi, You are already a programmer — you're here, you're reading, you're learning. That's all it takes to start. Margaret and Timothy are walking this path with you. Keep going. 🌹✨❤
I don't just know how I feel like giving up most times 😭
An off topic question: How you learn anything? What is the technique or process you follow to learn a new language or skill? Is it possible to quickly learn something or we get it with years of practice?
I get really amazed when ever I see a new post about new language or skill from you.
csm, honestly — curiosity first, always. I follow what genuinely interests me, read deeply, and write about it to solidify my understanding. Writing is how I learn. Thank you for the kind words.🙏❤✨
Thank you for answering my question! When ever I like a topic or something I get instant fear that will I be able to master it properly. But, after hearing it from you, I think I was missing the joy in learning because of the rush to master it!
🙏🙏🙏
Even though I don't agree with all, it was a great read. fun. I specially liked this:
There is some truth to that.
Just one correction, Timothy did not have a theory, he had a hypothesis or idea.
🙏✨
I’m really glad the “The Secret Life of Claude Code” series started. Many of us use AI in software development, but there aren’t yet many established workflows, processes or best practices. It’s a time of trial and error, confusion, sometimes misuse.
It’s clear that the community is still trying to understand AI’s impact and how to integrate it effectively into our work. There is a lot of AI-related content from software engineers on platforms like Dev.to, Reddit, Medium, or LinkedIn, and there are understandable fears and concerns: in jobs, for junior developers, etc.
That’s why I think series like this are so valuable as part of the common effort to figure it out together. I’m sure the community will eventually develop stable and effective practices, and such series will make a huge difference in helping us do it 🙂
🙏✨❤
@alptekin @marina_eremina
The line 'The floor got lower. The ceiling got higher. And the distance between them grew' is perhaps the most accurate description of the current state of engineering I’ve read.
We often mistake 'reduction of friction' for 'reduction of skill,' but as Margaret points out, the stakes for judgment have actually skyrocketed. It’s the difference between being a passenger and being the pilot; the autopilot does the heavy lifting, but you're the only one who knows if you're heading toward the right mountain. This series is a breath of fresh air amidst the binary 'AI vs. Human' hype. Looking forward to seeing Timothy’s first prompt!
Hi Syed!
The passenger and pilot distinction is exactly right — and it's one Margaret would approve of. The autopilot doesn't know which mountain you're heading toward. Only you do. That judgment is the skill that matters now.
Thank you for reading — cheers! ✨🌹🙏
The point about 'judgment' being the next layer of skill really hits home. It’s easy to get the result with these tools, but the real work is actually understanding why a solution works before shipping it. Deepening the fundamentals definitely feels like the best investment right now. Great read!
🙏❤✨
This is such a refreshing take! 🙌 Finally an article that's not just AI WILL REPLACE EVERYONE panic or "AI IS JUST A TOOL" dismissal. The Margaret vs Timothy dynamic really drives the point home.
That line about skill is not what you think it is hit different. In the age of AI, maybe being a senior dev isn't about knowing more syntax, but about knowing what questions to ask, what to trust, and what to ignore.
Would love to hear more about that "first evening with Claude Code" though What actually happened? Did Timothy go down a rabbit hole? Get stuck? Have that "wait this is wrong" moment?
Also, audio AND video versions? That's dedication! 🎧
✨🙏❤
Thanks for the refreshing post Aaron! Personally I became a developer because I loved the puzzle of building websites (seeing something I struggled with finally work). I now need to get used to the fact that I'm still doing that, but perhaps at another level and at a higher speed.
When the ceiling becomes higher and the floor lower, what would be some good advice for developers swimming in the middle (neither close to the ceiling or the floor)? I'm worried that its easy for me to overlook things due to the convincing nature of a (hallucinating) LLM. It's not that I don't want to read everything, but i wonder how i manage the thought "that makes sense" even if it isn't true.
Hi Willem! As far as advice goes, Margaret might say we should write down what we expect before we look at the output — requirements first, solution second. When you compare what you wrote to what Claude Code built, the gaps become visible even when the code looks convincing. Thanks for reading. Cheers! ✨🙏❤
I have been working in Software Development for 8 years, in different roles, except the engineer.
With Claude Code, I'm confident the my product has been built with a very concrete architect. It has good performance and doing good job in isolating data for privacy requirements.
I understand my repo structure, I learned how the code was written in certain way. If there is an issue, I can narrow down quickly potential root causes and I can tell if Claude overengineers.
The only thing that doesn't allow me to call myself a "product engineer" is that I cannot write a single line of code ( except HTML/CSS - and I'm pretty bad in JS ) . Honestly, I'm struggling in position myself in the current market.
Joey,
Margaret might say that you are a product engineer right now — you simply don't recognize it yet.
You understand architecture.
You reason about performance.
You isolate privacy concerns.
You know when the tool is overengineering.
You can narrow down root causes without writing the code yourself.
That is a lot!. That is most of the job.
The ability to write syntax is one skill among many — and increasingly, it is the skill the tools are absorbing.
The judgment you have built over eight years? That is what the tools cannot replace.
Stop measuring yourself against a definition of 'engineer' that was written before any of this existed.
The market may not have caught up to what you are yet. But it will. 🌹❤
I wonder. Newbies that are studiyng computer science now, will they ever know, in the deep, the real coding skills, as they already have the super ai at hand. Are we, old IT engineers that learned it the hard and long way, the last ones or vanishing ones that really understands it ? How should we ensure we pass the right knowledge to our children ?
Rémond, great questions. 💯
Hey, I'm an optimist. I don't think you and I are the last ones at all.
I think the real knowledge to pass on isn't syntax or algorithms. It's the thinking underneath — how to decompose a problem, how to recognize when something is wrong even if you can't immediately say why, how to read code with skepticism, how to know what a good solution feels like before you've written it.
Margaret would say: AI doesn't replace that judgment. It makes it more visible. The developer who never built that foundation will struggle in ways they may not even recognize.
So our job is exactly what this series is trying to do. Name the invisible skills. Make them teachable. Pass the lantern. 🔦
Your children are lucky to have someone asking this question on their behalf. ❤
Thanks Aaron, this resonates with many researches actually
🙏🌹❤
Great read – thanks for sharing on DEV!
🙏❤✨
Please am still a beginner please I just want to be a programmer 🤦🤦
Salut
Salut! ❤💯✨
Nice post, interesting idea
✨🙏❤️